An Air Force Academy cadet pled guilty to charges of running what is billed as a porn site, but actually sounds more like a "party" arranging site. In a separate story (which I can’t recommend, due to obnoxious pop-ups), the charges are detailed:

• Using a government computer to advertise and sell pornography for commercial gain.

Yeah, okay, that seems inappropriate.

• Storing and displaying pornography on a government computer.

Again, not what we probably want as taxpayers.

• Engaging in sexual intercourse and sodomy with women while other men were present, a conduct disgracing the armed forces.

Huh? Don’t we want our military men to be strong, virile, and confident enough to get it on, even with a crowd around?

• Wrongfully arranging for more than one man other than himself to engage in sexual intercourse with a woman.

Again, huh? Wrongfully arranging for only one man other than himself is okay? Rightfully arranging for more than one man other than himself is okay? Even the most likely arranging for one man other than himself? You’re only allowed to get one of your buddies laid? Ever? Or are we supposed to infer “with the same woman at the same time”?
And what about women arranging for other women to have sex with men? Or having sex with a man with other women present?